Market cap $313.26M · small-cap: thinner trading, bigger swings
No pattern has a proven 1-day record on this coin yet — the call above is from similar past setups.
Lookalike Setups (main) · 46% chance higher tomorrow · this pattern's 1d calls hit 52.0% of 7,699 — its chances have not beaten the simple all-coin up-rate so far · drawn from the 472 setups matched for the 30-day prediction
next day
−30%−20%−10%0%+10%+20%−20%−10%0%+10%+20%+5.4% in 30 days↑ 41% below its all-time high
−30dnow+1d
▲ 9 rose · ▼ 12 fell · ◆ 9 sideways(±2.3% over 1 day)
Bold: MON's own last 30 days. Right of now: 30 of the 472 setups matched for the 30-day prediction, and what each did over the next day — real hourly closes, scaled to MON's volatility. 28 with no hourly path on file yet are drawn through their daily lows, highs and closes.
Bad case$0.0260−9%1 in 10 did worse
Likely$0.0284−0.7%half did better, half worse
Good case$0.0312+9%1 in 10 did better
Typical move
−0.7%
Likely range
−9% to +9%$0.0260 – $0.0312
482 similar setups · our 1-day calls hit 52.2% in backtests · no edge over the base rate yet · track record →
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
MON price prediction for this week
57%chance MON is lower
▼ LEAN DOWN
Market cap $313.26M · small-cap: thinner trading, bigger swings
No pattern has a proven 7-day record on this coin yet — the call above is from similar past setups.
Lookalike Setups (main) · 43% chance higher in 7 days · this pattern's 7d calls hit 59.2% of 26,678 — no better than always guessing the usual direction (60%) so far · drawn from the 472 setups matched for the 30-day prediction
next 7 days
−30%−20%−10%0%+10%+20%0%+50%+100%+5.4% in 30 days↑ 41% below its all-time high
−30dnow+7d
▲ 8 rose · ▼ 13 fell · ◆ 9 sideways(±4.9% over 7 days)
Bold: MON's own last 30 days. Right of now: 30 of the 472 setups matched for the 30-day prediction, and what each did over the next 7 days — real 4-hour closes, scaled to MON's volatility. 28 with no 4-hour path on file yet are drawn through their daily lows, highs and closes.
Bad case$0.0216−24%1 in 10 did worse
Likely$0.0277−3.3%half did better, half worse
Good case$0.0361+26%1 in 10 did better
Typical move
−3.3%
Likely range
−24% to +26%$0.0216 – $0.0361
481 similar setups · our 7-day calls hit 59.6% in backtests · no edge over the base rate yet · track record →
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
MON price prediction for the next 30 days
58%chance MON is lower
▼ LEAN DOWN
Market cap $313.26M · small-cap: thinner trading, bigger swings
No pattern has a proven record on this coin yet — the prediction above is from similar past setups.
Lookalike Setups (main) · 42% chance higher in 30 days · drawn from its 472 matched past setups
next 30 days
−30%−20%−10%0%+10%+20%0%+200%+400%+5.4% in 30 days↑ 41% below its all-time high
−30dnow+30d
▲ 12 rose · ▼ 10 fell · ◆ 8 sideways(±15% over 30 days)
Bold: MON's own last 30 days. Right of now: 30 of the 472 past setups like this, and what each did over the next 30 days — real daily closes, scaled to MON's volatility.
Bad case$0.0154−46%1 in 10 did worse
Likely$0.0264−7.6%half did better, half worse
Good case$0.0497+74%1 in 10 did better
Typical move
−7.6%
Likely range
−46% to +74%$0.0154 – $0.0497
472 similar setups · our 30-day calls hit 61.5% in backtests · no edge over the base rate yet · track record →
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
Pick a side, when you close and your leverage: we replay that exact trade on the past cases behind this MON prediction and count how it ended.
No trade window for MON was profitable in most similar past cases with a positive average result and liquidations at or under 10% (n=472).
Chance this ends in profit—
Typical result—half did better, half worse
Chance you get liquidated first—
Every past case, replayedhover or tap a line to see the case
price went your way —against you —sideways —(within ±2.6% over 7 days)✕liquidated —take profit hit —stop loss hit —typical8 in 10 cases
Replays 380 past cases weighted exactly like the 30-day prediction: the 472 similar cases behind it plus a sample of all history.
Where the odds were best· swipe for longer holds →
cell = chance of profit color = average result, −50% or worse to +50% or better striped = liquidated in more than 1 in 10★ best: highest typical result with at most 1 in 10 liquidated, most cases in profit and an average above zerono take profit or stop loss · tap a cell to load it
The planner and its replay chart run in your browser: turn on JavaScript to replay your own MON trade on these past cases.
Odds from similar past cases, not financial advice. Leverage multiplies losses too: a liquidated position loses its whole margin.
Where to trade MON · by share of the last day's volume
MON$0.028954% ▼ 1Dbest playno play cleared the bar at 1Dopen calculator
MON$0.028957% ▼ 7Dbest playno play cleared the bar at 7Dopen calculator
MON$0.028958% ▼ 30Dbest playno play cleared the bar at 30Dopen calculator
2
Why we think this
the reasoning, in short
Drivers
Starting point: across all past cases, coins were higher a day later 47% of the time. Each factor below shows how often that happened in MON's situation; the call blends them with the closest match (482 cases) into 46% higher.
Volume spike
Trading volume jumped far above its 30-day normal (5.3 standard deviations). After volume spikes like this, coins were higher a day later 43% of the time (18,285 cases), vs 47% across all cases.
here 44% · normal 47% higher a day later
Bitcoin above its 50-day average
Bitcoin is above its 50-day average. In that situation, coins were higher a day later 48% of the time (150,860 cases), vs 47% across all cases.
here 48% · normal 47% higher a day later
Within 10% of a month ago
Within 10% of its price 30 days ago (+5%). After a month like that, coins were higher a day later 46% of the time (90,226 cases), vs 47% across all cases.
here 46% · normal 47% higher a day later
Small-cap
Small-cap coin ($347.4M market cap). Coins this size were higher a day later 48% of the time (109,209 cases), vs 47% across all cases.
here 48% · normal 47% higher a day later
Starting point: across all past cases, coins were higher 7 days later 44% of the time. Each factor below shows how often that happened in MON's situation; the call blends them with the closest match (481 cases) into 43% higher.
Bitcoin above its 50-day average
Bitcoin is above its 50-day average. In that situation, coins were higher a week later 46% of the time (148,942 cases), vs 44% across all cases.
here 46% · normal 44% higher 7 days later
Volume spike
Trading volume jumped far above its 30-day normal (5.3 standard deviations). After volume spikes like this, coins were higher a week later 43% of the time (18,170 cases), vs 44% across all cases.
here 43% · normal 44% higher 7 days later
Within 7% of a week ago
Within 7% of its price a week ago (+7%). After a week like that, coins were higher a week later 43% of the time (137,344 cases), vs 44% across all cases.
here 43% · normal 44% higher 7 days later
Within 10% of a month ago
Within 10% of its price 30 days ago (+5%). After a month like that, coins were higher a week later 44% of the time (89,668 cases), vs 44% across all cases.
here 44% · normal 44% higher 7 days later
Starting point: across all past cases, coins were higher 30 days later 39% of the time. Each factor below shows how often that happened in MON's situation; the call blends them with the closest match (472 cases) into 42% higher.
Bitcoin above its 50-day average
Bitcoin is above its 50-day average. In that situation, coins were higher 30 days later 43% of the time (141,385 cases), vs 39% across all cases.
here 43% · normal 39% higher 30 days later
Volume spike
Trading volume jumped far above its 30-day normal (5.3 standard deviations). After volume spikes like this, coins were higher 30 days later 42% of the time (17,534 cases), vs 39% across all cases.
here 42% · normal 39% higher 30 days later
Within 10% of a month ago
Within 10% of its price 30 days ago (+5%). After a month like that, coins were higher 30 days later 42% of the time (87,123 cases), vs 39% across all cases.
here 42% · normal 39% higher 30 days later
Other coin type
Outside the meme, DeFi and L1/L2 groups. Coins outside those groups were higher 30 days later 39% of the time (255,282 cases), vs 39% across all cases.
here 39% · normal 39% higher 30 days later
Our record on MON
Our last 6 calls on MON over 30 days: right on 1 of 6 · 6 of 6 ended inside our range · all-time on MON: 37.9% hit rate, 83.9% inside the range (29 backtested calls)
Aug 2 said 60% down · ended +26.5%✗ wrongAug 9 said 60% down · ended +22.2%✗ wrongAug 16 said 58% down · ended +6.8%✗ wrongAug 23 said 60% down · ended −10.1%✓ rightAug 30 said 72% down · ended +1.2%✗ wrongSep 6 said 65% down · ended +5.4%✗ wrong
white: MON's real price after each call · bar: the range we gave (8 in 10 cases, the middle half thicker, a notch at the typical move) · end dot: green right · red wrong · orange the price went sideways (within ±5.5% over 30 days) or a coin flip · backtest: each call used only data available that day · live since Oct 4, 2026: 3 live 30-day predictions on record, first result due Nov 3, 2026 · the full scorecard →
last 6 months · daily close · candle = 2 sessions◆ recorded event · dotted blue line = last price · orange = the price went sideways (within ±1.4% over 2 days)
as of · generated from this record's own rowsread it →
events on record
28
higher 30 days after
8 of 23
typical 30-day move
−10.6%
next up
—
Every eventMEASURED28 events
The record: every event and what followed
as of · CoinPaprika · DefiLlama · exchange announcements · PatternPlus effectsread it →
MON: 28 events, newest first; six signed numbers per row are the price change from the close before the event, in UTC; vs BTC is the difference of the two 30-day moves
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-09-21 averaged +0.0062% an hour (+54% a year), above 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. MON saw a funding extreme high on Sep 22, 2026; the day-30 effect will be recorded in 16 days (day 1: −6.3%).
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-09-06 averaged +0.0070% an hour (+62% a year), above 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. MON saw a funding extreme high on Sep 7, 2026; the day-30 effect will be recorded in 1 day (day 1: −5.5%).
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-08-27 averaged -0.0047% an hour (-42% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Aug 28, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it fell 6.6% by day 1 and was 1.7% lower 30 days later, 7 points behind BTC; it had moved +7.0% in the 7 days before.
MON closed 2026-08-255.4% dearer on Upbit (KRW-MON, in won) than elsewhere, both measured in Bitcoin, above 100% of its past year: Korean buyers chasing it. The move is the coin's, from that day's close. On Aug 26, 2026 MON saw a Korean premium spike; it rose 3.0% by day 1 and was 4.9% lower 30 days later, 12 points behind BTC; it had moved +30.6% in the 7 days before.
Users paid MON's protocol $101k in fees in the week to 2026-08-23 (DefiLlama), 2.1 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2026-08-25: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. On Aug 25, 2026 MON saw a fee surge; it fell 9.6% by day 1 and was 20.9% lower 30 days later, 28 points behind BTC; it had moved +44.9% in the 7 days before.
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-08-21 averaged +0.0058% an hour (+50% a year), above 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Aug 22, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme high; it rose 5.9% by day 1 and was 10.6% lower 30 days later, 21 points behind BTC; it had moved +35.6% in the 7 days before.
Binance's MONUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-08-17 added up to -0.1517% over the day (-55% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Aug 18, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it rose 3.6% by day 1 and was 6.7% higher 30 days later, 12 points behind BTC; it had moved +0.1% in the 7 days before.
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-06-28 averaged -0.0060% an hour (-53% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Jun 29, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it fell 1.8% by day 1 and was 11.3% higher 30 days later, 4 points ahead of BTC; it had moved −10.1% in the 7 days before.
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-06-05 averaged -0.0047% an hour (-41% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Jun 6, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it rose 5.3% by day 1 and was 18.9% higher 30 days later, 14 points ahead of BTC; it had moved −9.8% in the 7 days before.
MON closed 2026-05-282.6% dearer on Upbit (KRW-MON, in won) than elsewhere, both measured in Bitcoin, above 100% of its past year: Korean buyers chasing it. The move is the coin's, from that day's close. On May 29, 2026 MON saw a Korean premium spike; it fell 1.9% by day 1 and was 21.1% lower 30 days later, 2 points behind BTC; it had moved −17.4% in the 7 days before.
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-05-28 averaged -0.0054% an hour (-48% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On May 29, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it fell 1.9% by day 1 and was 21.1% lower 30 days later, 2 points behind BTC; it had moved −17.4% in the 7 days before.
Binance's MONUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-05-15 added up to -0.1674% over the day (-61% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On May 16, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it fell 1.7% by day 1 and was 20.1% lower 30 days later, 4 points behind BTC; it had moved −17.4% in the 7 days before.
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-05-01 averaged -0.0045% an hour (-39% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On May 2, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it fell 3.1% by day 1 and was 25.0% lower 30 days later, 16 points behind BTC; it had moved −1.9% in the 7 days before.
Users paid MON's protocol $52k in fees in the week to 2026-04-12 (DefiLlama), 2.0 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2026-04-14: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. On Apr 14, 2026 MON saw a fee surge; it fell 2.5% by day 1 and was 17.3% lower 30 days later, 26 points behind BTC; it had moved +32.8% in the 7 days before.
MON-USDT spot trading (quotes: EUR, TRY, USDT, USDC). On Mar 23, 2026OKX listed MON; it rose 13.7% by day 1 and was 64.1% higher 30 days later, 49 points ahead of BTC; it had moved −12.3% in the 7 days before.
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-03-19 averaged -0.0083% an hour (-73% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Mar 20, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it fell 2.6% by day 1 and was 36.7% higher 30 days later, 31 points ahead of BTC; it had moved +3.5% in the 7 days before.
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-03-09 averaged -0.0058% an hour (-51% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Mar 10, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it rose 0.8% by day 1 and was 55.2% higher 30 days later, 50 points ahead of BTC; it had moved +0.3% in the 7 days before.
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-02-22 averaged -0.0053% an hour (-46% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Feb 23, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it rose 1.1% by day 1 and was 33.0% higher 30 days later, 28 points ahead of BTC; it had moved −17.3% in the 7 days before.
Hyperliquid's MON perpetual: funding on 2026-02-06 averaged -0.0043% an hour (-38% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Feb 7, 2026 MON saw a funding extreme low; it fell 2.5% by day 1 and was 14.3% higher 30 days later, 17 points ahead of BTC; it had moved −8.1% in the 7 days before.
Users paid MON's protocol $27k in fees in the week to 2025-12-29 (DefiLlama), 0.4 times its weekly average over the 4 weeks before. DefiLlama fills a day in after it ends, so the event is dated 2025-12-31: the move is the coin's from the close a full day after that week. On Dec 31, 2025 MON saw a fee slump; it rose 5.0% by day 1 and was 10.5% lower 30 days later, 6 points behind BTC; it had moved +14.3% in the 7 days before.
all-time high MON all-time high: $0.0488
—
+20.9%
−11.1%
−33.4%
−49.2%
−49.2%
−56.2%
derived
Highest daily close in our price history. On Nov 26, 2025 MON set an all-time high; it fell 11.1% by day 1 and was 49.2% lower 30 days later, 49 points behind BTC; it had moved +20.9% in the 7 days before.
MONUSDT perpetual trading. Announced 2025-11-25: New Listing : MONUSDT Perpetual Contract, with up to 50x leverage On Nov 24, 2025Bybit opened perpetual futures for MON; it rose 32.4% by day 1 and was 37.5% lower 30 days later, 38 points behind BTC; it had moved −26.7% in the 7 days before.
On Nov 23, 2025Bybit listed MON; it rose 7.1% by day 1 and was 30.6% lower 30 days later, 34 points behind BTC; it had moved −37.9% in the 7 days before.
MONUSDT perpetual trading. On Oct 10, 2025Binance opened perpetual futures for MON; it rose 8.2% by day 1 and was 29.2% lower 30 days later, 15 points behind BTC.
MON-USDT-SWAP perpetual trading. On Oct 10, 2025OKX opened perpetual futures for MON; it rose 8.2% by day 1 and was 29.2% lower 30 days later, 15 points behind BTC.
Source: PatternPlus, computed from every token in the peer set · fetched
4
The full write-up
every sentence on MON · questions · sources
MON in short
Filed under crypto on its own chain, Monad (MON) has been with no start date recorded; it holds rank #151 by market cap as of Oct 6, 2026 and trades 40.6% below its Nov 26, 2025 high.
As of Oct 6, 2026 the price is $0.0289 (−7.9% over 24 hours), market cap $313.3M, fully diluted value $2.89B, holder count not reported, no TVL reported to DefiLlama.
This page is about Monad on its own chain; 1 other token on record use the symbol MON: MON Protocol (chain not recorded).
Status on CoinPaprika: active; MON is the native coin of its own chain, so there is no token contract.
CoinPaprika tickers and DefiLlama, read Oct 6, 2026.
This site has 28 past events for Monad: 3 exchange listings, 4 futures listings, 0 unlocks, 0 hacks and 0 funding rounds; the median 30-day move after the 23 measured events was −10.6%.
From the latest data refresh
Monad (MON), crypto on its own chain, holds rank #151 by market cap on Oct 6, 2026 and trades 40.6% under its Nov 26, 2025 high.
Its 5 measured listings show a median day-30 move of −29.2%, 1 of them above the venue median.
Since PatternPlus began recording on Oct 3, 2026 (4 daily snapshots), rank moved from #141 to #151.
MON is on 4 spot and 3 perpetual venues on record; the earliest dated listing was Binance (perp) on Oct 10, 2025.
5 of its listings have a measured day-30 outcome (median −29.2%); 1 finished above the venue's own listing median and 4 below.
No unlock schedule is on record for MON as of Oct 6, 2026.
No on-chain power check is on record for MON as of Oct 6, 2026.
No funding round is recorded by DefiLlama for Monad as of Oct 6, 2026.
Monad lists 0 audit links on DefiLlama; no hack is recorded as of Oct 6, 2026.
No team member is recorded on CoinPaprika for Monad as of Oct 6, 2026.
DefiLlama reports not reported TVL and $400,753 revenue over 30 days as of Oct 6, 2026;
revenue to market cap of 0.015 sits at the 60th percentile of 1594 all tokens on record tokens.
Generated from this record's own rows at build time; as of Oct 6, 2026.
Across 811 funding extreme lows across every token on record, the median move is −0.8% on day 1 and −4.6% by day 30; 42.2% were still up after 30 days; MON's 11 sit above that median at +11.3%.
Across 75 Korean premium spikes across every token on record, the median move is +0.2% on day 1 and −6.3% by day 30;
36.0% were still up after 30 days;
MON's 2 sit below that median at −13.0%.
Across 563 fee surges across every token on record, the median move is +0.2% on day 1 and −1.0% by day 30;
49.0% were still up after 30 days;
MON's 2 sit below that median at −19.1%.
Across 121 funding extreme highs across every token on record, the median move is −1.4% on day 1 and −1.1% by day 30;
48.8% were still up after 30 days;
MON's one sits below that median at −10.6%.
Across 255 spot listings on OKX, the median move is −0.8% on day 1 and −7.8% by day 30;
40.8% were still up after 30 days;
MON's one sits above that median at +64.1%.
Across 480 fee slumps across every token on record, the median move is −0.7% on day 1 and −8.5% by day 30;
36.5% were still up after 30 days;
MON's one sits below that median at −10.5%.
Across 644 all-time highs across every token on record, the median move is −3.7% on day 1 and −38.6% by day 30;
6.2% were still up after 30 days;
MON's one sits below that median at −49.2%.
Across 446 perpetual listings on Bybit, the median move is −0.3% on day 1 and −16.9% by day 30;
33.4% were still up after 30 days;
MON's one sits below that median at −37.5%.
Across 180 spot listings on Bybit, the median move is −3.8% on day 1 and −22.8% by day 30;
27.2% were still up after 30 days;
MON's one sits below that median at −30.6%.
Across 497 perpetual listings on Binance, the median move is −0.3% on day 1 and −14.7% by day 30;
39.2% were still up after 30 days;
MON's one sits below that median at −29.2%.
Across 251 perpetual listings on OKX, the median move is −0.6% on day 1 and −16.9% by day 30;
36.3% were still up after 30 days;
MON's one sits below that median at −29.2%.
MON sits above the venue median in 2 of 11 venue-and-kind comparisons as of Oct 6, 2026.
event_stats recomputed nightly; as of Oct 6, 2026.
No on-chain power check is available for MON on its own chain as of Oct 6, 2026; every row of the panel is shown as unknown until GoPlus or the Jupiter token API answers.
Until then this site cannot say whether the issuer can mint, freeze or upgrade MON; the check is retried at every rebuild.
28 events since May 24, 2024; 15 of the 23 measured were followed by a lower price 30 days later; best OKX lists MON on Mar 23, 2026 (+64.1%), worst MON all-time high: $0.0488 on Nov 26, 2025 (−49.2%).
362 daily closes from Oct 10, 2025 to Oct 6, 2026 are plotted on a log scale, with the rank from 4 snapshots as a step line.
The all-time high marker sits at $0.0488 on Nov 26, 2025, 314 days before Oct 6, 2026.
prices, metrics_daily, events and effects; as of Oct 6, 2026.
30 changes are logged for this page since Oct 5, 2026; the latest, on Oct 6, 2026, is: New record entry (funding low, May 16, 2026): Funding -61% a year: shorts paying longs.
MON is on 4 spot and 3 perpetual venues on record; the earliest was Binance (perp) on Oct 10, 2025 and the latest OKX (spot) on Mar 23, 2026; the first perpetual opened on Binance on Oct 10, 2025, 164 days before the first spot pair.
0 delistings are on record for MON as of Oct 6, 2026.
1082 of the 1087 tracked exchanges have no MON listing on record as of Oct 6, 2026 (Bitget, Pionex, Azbit, WEEX, Lbank and Biconomy, among others).
exchange_listings from instrument APIs and announcements; as of Oct 6, 2026.
Monad trades 40.6% below its all-time high of $0.0488, set on Nov 26, 2025, 314 days before Oct 6, 2026; over 30 days it moved 0.0% against 0.0% for BTC (beta 1.53).
Price change as of Oct 6, 2026: −0.3% over 1 hour, −7.9% over 24 hours, +4.8% over 7 days, 0.0% over 30 days, 0.0% over 1 year.
Market cap is 10.8% of fully diluted value ($313.3M of $2.89B), so 89.2% of the valuation sits in supply that does not circulate yet.
24-hour volume of $36M is 11.5% of market cap as of Oct 6, 2026.
Circulating supply is 10.83B of 100B total (10.8%) and a maximum of 100B.
The all tokens on record median 30-day change is 0.0% across 1594 tokens, so MON sits below its peer set.
CoinPaprika tickers read Oct 6, 2026; BTC comparison from the BTC record.
No contract or mint address is recorded for Monad as of Oct 6, 2026.
1 other record use the symbol MON: MON Protocol (chain not recorded); this page is the its own chain token.
Monad shares its ticker with MON (DeFi Franc Moneta), MON (MON Protocol), MON (MONNFTS), MON (MoneyByte), MON (MonfterToken) and MON (Monstock) (ticker collision on CoinPaprika, read Oct 6, 2026).
Identity fields from CoinPaprika as of Oct 6, 2026: start date not recorded, first market data Nov 24, 2025, proof type not stated, organisation structure not stated, no whitepaper link.
Cross-references as of Oct 6, 2026: CoinPaprika id mon-monad, DefiLlama slug monad, no GitHub repository recorded.
No follower or star counts were read for Monad as of Oct 6, 2026.
CoinPaprika /coins and DefiLlama /protocols (contract addresses), token_contracts, token_aliases; read Oct 6, 2026.
Monad reported $474,872 in fees and $400,753 in revenue over 30 days to DefiLlama on not reported TVL as of Oct 6, 2026; its revenue-to-market-cap ratio of 0.015 is at the 60th percentile of 1594 all tokens on record tokens.
Annualised revenue of $4.8M gives a price-to-sales multiple of 65.1x at the $313.3M market cap of Oct 6, 2026.
DefiLlama records no parent protocol for Monad (not a fork).
No oracle is listed for Monad on DefiLlama.
DefiLlama lists Monad under 'Chain' (slug monad).
DefiLlama protocol, fees and TVL endpoints; as of Oct 6, 2026.
Set against 1594 all tokens on record tokens on Oct 6, 2026, Monad ranks at the 91st percentile for market cap, the 91st for distance from its high and the unranked for share of supply unlocked.
The peer median market cap is $12.8M, the median distance from ATH −95.0% and the median 30-day change 0.0%.
The nearest peers by rank are Olympus V2 (#150), Gnosis (#152), First Digital USD (#149), Arweave (#153) and Decred (#148).
Market cap: $313.3M (P91 of 1594; peer median $12.8M).
Volume / market cap (24h): 11.50% (P79 of 1594; peer median 2.42%).
30-day change: 0.0% (P50 of 1594; peer median 0.0%).
Distance from ATH: −40.6% (P91 of 1594; peer median −95.0%).
Revenue / market cap (30d): 0.015 (P60 of 288; peer median 0.006).
peer set: all tokens on record (1594 tokens); as of Oct 6, 2026.
293,063 older closes on 652 coins, back to 2017-08-17; 404 reached their first Binance day, 8 stopped at a 10x day or a gap, 1 older tickers of another coin left out, 239 with nothing older; 0 for later nights
313,593 coin-days stored tonight (314,256 held, the oldest 2020-08-05); 300 of 300 coins finished (each back to its contract's first day), 0 left for later nights; 3 days left out by the price check (the contract was another coin then); 0 errors; 104,391 days stored with no close of ours to check against
144 coins whose protocols took $100k+ in fees over 30 days; 134 read tonight, 144,935 coin-days stored; 1446 fee jumps and slumps; the rest comes over the next nights
55,006 coin-driver tests; 220 proven on 137 coins, 2874 likely; 47,817 more by the trimmed mean in the same cut, which found 68 proven and 167 likely more that earn with the tails in, and 565 more that did not on their newer half (dropped)
2026-10-06 16:27 UTC
none
—
edge
35 kinds of event against their coins' ordinary days, by day; a clear edge (95% range, both halves agree) up for fees_jump, funding_low, futures_listing, spx_drop, down for delisting, fear, futures_listing, hack, kr_discount, listing, tvl_jump
2026-10-06 16:26 UTC
none
—
effects
12005 effects, 51 stats rows
2026-10-06 16:26 UTC
none
—
etherscan
skipped: no ETHERSCAN_KEY in data/config_local.py or the environment
522 of our coins trade as Gate USDT perpetuals; 522 read tonight, 89878 coin-days stored; 4 liquidation spikes as events; the rest is read on the next nights
176 of our coins trade as Hyperliquid perps; 29 read up to now tonight (121 pages), 11234 coin-days stored; 179 funding extremes; the rest of the history comes over the next nights
827 of 1594 coins have a logo (coingecko 713, trustwallet 108, jupiter 5, website 1). Tonight 40 asked: 4 from coingecko, 3 from trustwallet, 1 from jupiter; 32 with none yet; coinpaprika refused us (HTTP 403) and was not asked again after 30. Without one, by rank: RAIN, CC, WETH, JITOSOL, RETH, KHYPE, RSETH, WBNB, SUSDE, SYRUPUSDC, METH, JLP (drop a file in data/curated/logos/<slug>.png)
703 collected series, 343 with enough history; 5,857 tests; 1 proven, 273 likely; 1 series tested from a later day (their values hold that day's move)
2026-10-06 16:28 UTC
none
—
setups
setups re-measured on our own prices
2026-10-06 16:28 UTC
none
—
signals
7 proven signals: ath after (30d), ath after (7d), cb_discount after (7d), pump after (30d), pump after (7d), vol_spike after (30d), vol_spike after (7d); 32 of tonight's predictions moved
2026-10-06 16:27 UTC
none
—
snapshot
daily snapshots and the change log
2026-10-06 16:47 UTC
none
—
snapshot_org
1423 governance votes on 40 coins from 40 Snapshot spaces; tonight 0 proposals read (to 2026-09-10), 0 big closed ones kept, 3 open or pending; 1 events new, 1 removed
3144 rules tested; 6 survived discovery and the holdout (5 new tonight): funding_7:high:3d:q10:all:clean, ret_1:low:1d:q20:bear, volume_trend:low:1d:q10:bear; 1788 distinct rules, each pool by each detector in one false-discovery cut; the trimmed-mean test found 32 more past discovery, 4 of them earning with the tails back in; 11 in the book
10 of 224 coins with 120+ days of supply history release on a monthly or quarterly pattern; 39 releases projected: APT (monthly, day 14), ARB (quarterly, day 18), ENA (monthly, day 6), ETHFI (quarterly, day 17), GRASS (monthly, day 29), IO (monthly, day 1), KCS (quarterly, day 1), MOVE (monthly, day 9), STRK (quarterly, day 16), WLD (quarterly, day 21)
2026-10-06 15:34 UTC
none
—
teamfinance
1 of 47 coins hold Team Finance vesting; 4 contracts still being read for the first time
Effects are measured as described on the methodology page. Facts are compiled from public sources; nothing on this page is advice. Corrections: [email protected].
ethplorer last fetched successfully on Oct 6, 2026 15:30 UTC;
the latest fetch failed (2026-10-06T15:30:28+00:00 HTTP 429 https://api.ethplorer.io/getTokenInfo/0x66fd8), so its figures are shown from that earlier run.
fred last fetched successfully on an unrecorded time;
the latest fetch failed (2026-10-06T15:34:09+00:00 no FRED_API_KEY: the jobs, PPI, PCE, GDP and retail sa), so its figures are shown from that earlier run.
This page is generated from 5,298 database rows and rebuilt daily; first published Oct 5, 2026.
PatternPlus compiles facts from public sources and gives no financial advice; corrections by email. As of Oct 6, 2026.
How to read this
Band 1 is the prediction: the chance of a higher price, the typical move and the likely range, with the real past setups behind it drawn as they moved.
Band 2 is why: the drivers, the next events and how our past calls on this coin went.
Band 3 is the data: every table and chart, dated; green means the price was higher afterwards, red lower.
Band 4 is the write-up: the same record in words, with the questions and the sources.
