Market cap $1.51M · micro-cap: thinner trading, bigger swings
No pattern has a proven 1-day record on this coin yet — the call above is from similar past setups.
Lookalike Setups (main) · 44% chance higher tomorrow · this pattern's 1d calls hit 52.0% of 7,699 — its chances have not beaten the simple all-coin up-rate so far · drawn from the 282 setups matched for the 30-day prediction
next day
0%+20%+40%+60%−40%−20%0%+20%+40%−30% in 30 days↑ 100% below its all-time high
−30dnow+1d
▲ 8 rose · ▼ 12 fell · ◆ 10 sideways(±3.6% over 1 day)
Bold: LAB's own last 30 days. Right of now: 30 of the 282 setups matched for the 30-day prediction, and what each did over the next day — real hourly closes, scaled to LAB's volatility. 30 with no hourly path on file yet are drawn through their daily lows, highs and closes.
Bad case$0.0412−18%1 in 10 did worse
Likely$0.0493−2.0%half did better, half worse
Good case$0.0596+19%1 in 10 did better
Typical move
−2.0%
Likely range
−18% to +19%$0.0412 – $0.0596
307 similar setups · our 1-day calls hit 52.2% in backtests · no edge over the base rate yet · track record →
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
LAB price prediction for this week
54%chance LAB is lower
↔ COIN FLIP
Market cap $1.51M · micro-cap: thinner trading, bigger swings
No pattern has a proven 7-day record on this coin yet — the call above is from similar past setups.
Lookalike Setups (main) · 46% chance higher in 7 days · this pattern's 7d calls hit 59.2% of 26,678 — no better than always guessing the usual direction (60%) so far · drawn from the 282 setups matched for the 30-day prediction
next 7 days
0%+20%+40%+60%0%+200%+400%−30% in 30 days↑ 100% below its all-time high
−30dnow+7d
▲ 14 rose · ▼ 10 fell · ◆ 6 sideways(±14% over 7 days)
Bold: LAB's own last 30 days. Right of now: 30 of the 282 setups matched for the 30-day prediction, and what each did over the next 7 days — real 4-hour closes, scaled to LAB's volatility. 30 with no 4-hour path on file yet are drawn through their daily lows, highs and closes.
Bad case$0.0268−47%1 in 10 did worse
Likely$0.0485−3.6%half did better, half worse
Good case$0.0789+57%1 in 10 did better
Typical move
−3.6%
Likely range
−47% to +57%$0.0268 – $0.0789
301 similar setups · our 7-day calls hit 59.6% in backtests · no edge over the base rate yet · track record →
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
LAB price prediction for the next 30 days
56%chance LAB is lower
▼ LEAN DOWN
Market cap $1.51M · micro-cap: thinner trading, bigger swings
No pattern has a proven record on this coin yet — the prediction above is from similar past setups.
Lookalike Setups (main) · 44% chance higher in 30 days · drawn from its 282 matched past setups
next 30 days
0%+20%+40%+60%0%+200%+400%−30% in 30 days↑ 100% below its all-time high
−30dnow+30d
▲ 11 rose · ▼ 9 fell · ◆ 10 sideways(±37% over 30 days)
Bold: LAB's own last 30 days. Right of now: 30 of the 282 past setups like this, and what each did over the next 30 days — real daily closes, scaled to LAB's volatility.
Bad case$0.0130−74%1 in 10 did worse
Likely$0.0459−8.9%half did better, half worse
Good case$0.136+171%1 in 10 did better
Typical move
−8.9%
Likely range
−74% to +171%$0.0130 – $0.136
282 similar setups · our 30-day calls hit 61.5% in backtests · no edge over the base rate yet · track record →
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
Pick a side, when you close and your leverage: we replay that exact trade on the past cases behind this LAB prediction and count how it ended.
No trade window for LAB was profitable in most similar past cases with a positive average result and liquidations at or under 10% (n=282).
Chance this ends in profit—
Typical result—half did better, half worse
Chance you get liquidated first—
Every past case, replayedhover or tap a line to see the case
price went your way —against you —sideways —(within ±2.6% over 7 days)✕liquidated —take profit hit —stop loss hit —typical8 in 10 cases
Replays 356 past cases weighted exactly like the 30-day prediction: the 282 similar cases behind it plus a sample of all history.
Where the odds were best· swipe for longer holds →
cell = chance of profit color = average result, −50% or worse to +50% or better striped = liquidated in more than 1 in 10★ best: highest typical result with at most 1 in 10 liquidated, most cases in profit and an average above zerono take profit or stop loss · tap a cell to load it
The planner and its replay chart run in your browser: turn on JavaScript to replay your own LAB trade on these past cases.
Odds from similar past cases, not financial advice. Leverage multiplies losses too: a liquidated position loses its whole margin.
Where to trade LAB · by share of the last day's volume
LAB$0.050356% ▼ 1Dbest playno play cleared the bar at 1Dopen calculator
LAB$0.050354% ▼ 7Dbest playno play cleared the bar at 7Dopen calculator
LAB$0.050356% ▼ 30Dbest playno play cleared the bar at 30Dopen calculator
2
Why we think this
the reasoning, in short
Drivers
Starting point: across all past cases, coins were higher a day later 47% of the time. Each factor below shows how often that happened in LAB's situation; the call blends them with the closest match (307 cases) into 44% higher.
Volume spike
Trading volume jumped far above its 30-day normal (4.6 standard deviations). After volume spikes like this, coins were higher a day later 43% of the time (18,285 cases), vs 47% across all cases.
here 44% · normal 47% higher a day later
Bitcoin above its 50-day average
Bitcoin is above its 50-day average. In that situation, coins were higher a day later 48% of the time (150,860 cases), vs 47% across all cases.
here 48% · normal 47% higher a day later
Micro-cap
Micro-cap coin ($1.5M market cap). Coins this size were higher a day later 46% of the time (107,048 cases), vs 47% across all cases.
here 46% · normal 47% higher a day later
Down 30% over 30 days
Down 30% over the last 30 days. After a month like that, coins were higher a day later 48% of the time (119,867 cases), vs 47% across all cases.
here 48% · normal 47% higher a day later
Starting point: across all past cases, coins were higher 7 days later 44% of the time. Each factor below shows how often that happened in LAB's situation; the call blends them with the closest match (301 cases) into 46% higher.
Bitcoin above its 50-day average
Bitcoin is above its 50-day average. In that situation, coins were higher a week later 46% of the time (148,942 cases), vs 44% across all cases.
here 46% · normal 44% higher 7 days later
Volume spike
Trading volume jumped far above its 30-day normal (4.6 standard deviations). After volume spikes like this, coins were higher a week later 43% of the time (18,170 cases), vs 44% across all cases.
here 43% · normal 44% higher 7 days later
Down 30% over 30 days
Down 30% over the last 30 days. After a month like that, coins were higher a week later 43% of the time (119,473 cases), vs 44% across all cases.
here 43% · normal 44% higher 7 days later
Within 7% of a week ago
Within 7% of its price a week ago (−4%). After a week like that, coins were higher a week later 43% of the time (137,344 cases), vs 44% across all cases.
here 43% · normal 44% higher 7 days later
Starting point: across all past cases, coins were higher 30 days later 39% of the time. Each factor below shows how often that happened in LAB's situation; the call blends them with the closest match (282 cases) into 44% higher.
Bitcoin above its 50-day average
Bitcoin is above its 50-day average. In that situation, coins were higher 30 days later 43% of the time (141,385 cases), vs 39% across all cases.
here 43% · normal 39% higher 30 days later
Volume spike
Trading volume jumped far above its 30-day normal (4.6 standard deviations). After volume spikes like this, coins were higher 30 days later 42% of the time (17,534 cases), vs 39% across all cases.
here 42% · normal 39% higher 30 days later
Down 30% over 30 days
Down 30% over the last 30 days. After a month like that, coins were higher 30 days later 38% of the time (117,871 cases), vs 39% across all cases.
here 38% · normal 39% higher 30 days later
Other coin type
Outside the meme, DeFi and L1/L2 groups. Coins outside those groups were higher 30 days later 39% of the time (255,282 cases), vs 39% across all cases.
here 39% · normal 39% higher 30 days later
Our record on LAB
Our last 6 calls on LAB over 30 days: right on 5 of 5, 1 more was a coin flip · 6 of 6 ended inside our range · all-time on LAB: 48.1% hit rate, 50.0% inside the range (27 backtested calls)
Aug 2 said 59% down · ended −49.9%✓ rightAug 9 said 59% down · ended −43.4%✓ rightAug 16 said 64% down · ended −38.3%✓ rightAug 23 said 59% down · ended −11.1%✓ rightAug 30 said 56% down · ended −29.3%✓ rightSep 6 said 54% down · ended −29.8%coin flip
white: LAB's real price after each call · bar: the range we gave (8 in 10 cases, the middle half thicker, a notch at the typical move) · end dot: green right · red wrong · orange the price went sideways (within ±5.5% over 30 days) or a coin flip · backtest: each call used only data available that day · live since Oct 4, 2026: 3 live 30-day predictions on record, first result due Nov 3, 2026 · the full scorecard →
active —
NoneRank #1,438on record since 2025-10-14
$0.0503
24H+1.8%
30D0.0%
1Y0.0%
FROM ATH−99.8%
last 6 months · daily close · candle = 2 sessions◆ recorded event · dotted blue line = last price · orange = the price went sideways (within ±1.4% over 2 days)
as of · generated from this record's own rowsread it →
events on record
37
higher 30 days after
4 of 14
typical 30-day move
−42.3%
next up
—
Every eventMEASURED37 events
The record: every event and what followed
as of · CoinPaprika · DefiLlama · exchange announcements · PatternPlus effectsread it →
LAB: 37 events, newest first; six signed numbers per row are the price change from the close before the event, in UTC; vs BTC is the difference of the two 30-day moves
Binance's LABUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-08-15 added up to +0.2538% over the day (+93% a year), above 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Aug 16, 2026 LAB saw a funding extreme high; it fell 5.8% by day 1 and was 42.4% lower 30 days later, 62 points behind BTC; it had moved −32.3% in the 7 days before.
Binance's LABUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-08-05 added up to +0.2957% over the day (+108% a year), above 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Aug 6, 2026 LAB saw a funding extreme high; it fell 1.6% by day 1 and was 42.2% lower 30 days later, 66 points behind BTC; it had moved −17.2% in the 7 days before.
Binance's LABUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-07-11 added up to +0.2822% over the day (+103% a year), above 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Jul 12, 2026 LAB saw a funding extreme high; it fell 55.5% by day 1 and was 79.5% lower 30 days later, 79 points behind BTC; it had moved −96.4% in the 7 days before.
Binance's LABUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-06-21 added up to -0.1744% over the day (-64% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Jun 22, 2026 LAB saw a funding extreme low; it fell 9.1% by day 1 and was 99.0% lower 30 days later, 103 points behind BTC; it had moved +42.9% in the 7 days before.
Binance's LABUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-06-06 added up to +0.5128% over the day (+187% a year), above 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Jun 7, 2026 LAB saw a funding extreme high; it fell 13.4% by day 1 and was 54.2% lower 30 days later, 58 points behind BTC; it had moved +67.6% in the 7 days before.
all-time high LAB all-time high: $27.15
—
+273.6%
+2.7%
−42.1%
−26.2%
−12.5%
−99.5%
derived
Highest daily close in our price history. On Jun 2, 2026 LAB set an all-time high; it rose 2.7% by day 1 and was 26.2% lower 30 days later, 12 points behind BTC; it had moved +273.6% in the 7 days before.
Binance's LABUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-05-28 added up to -0.1362% over the day (-50% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On May 29, 2026 LAB saw a funding extreme low; it rose 82.5% by day 1 and was 278.9% higher 30 days later, 298 points ahead of BTC; it had moved −2.1% in the 7 days before.
Binance's LABUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-05-19 added up to -0.0052% over the day (-2% a year), below 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On May 20, 2026 LAB saw a funding extreme low; it rose 5.5% by day 1 and was 200.0% higher 30 days later, 217 points ahead of BTC; it had moved −12.5% in the 7 days before.
Binance's LABUSDT perpetual: funding on 2026-04-06 added up to +0.2696% over the day (+98% a year), above 95% of its past year. The move is the coin's from that day's close, when the day's funding was known. On Apr 7, 2026 LAB saw a funding extreme high; it rose 25.5% by day 1 and was 1419.4% higher 30 days later, 1403 points ahead of BTC; it had moved +36.3% in the 7 days before.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 25% during 2025-11-17, from $15M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-11-19, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. On Nov 19, 2025 LAB saw a TVL crash; it fell 13.6% by day 1 and was 5.1% lower 30 days later, 0 points ahead of BTC; it had moved −22.1% in the 7 days before.
LAB-USDT-SWAP perpetual trading. On Nov 1, 2025OKX opened perpetual futures for LAB; it fell 0.5% by day 1 and was 63.0% lower 30 days later, 42 points behind BTC; it had moved −13.8% in the 7 days before.
LABUSDT perpetual trading. On Oct 27, 2025Bybit opened perpetual futures for LAB; it fell 20.1% by day 1 and was 57.0% lower 30 days later, 36 points behind BTC; it had moved +7.1% in the 7 days before.
LABUSDT perpetual trading. On Oct 17, 2025Binance opened perpetual futures for LAB; it fell 36.5% by day 1 and was 60.4% lower 30 days later, 47 points behind BTC.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 39% during 2025-10-08, from $62M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-10-10, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. On Oct 10, 2025 LAB saw a TVL crash; it was not measured by day 1 and was 31.0% higher 30 days later, 45 points ahead of BTC.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 55% during 2025-09-30, from $38M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-10-02, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Oct 2, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 37% during 2025-09-22, from $65M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-09-24, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Sep 24, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 60% during 2025-09-15, from $38M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-09-17, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Sep 17, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 35% during 2025-09-12, from $66M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-09-14, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Sep 14, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 54% during 2025-08-28, from $42M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-08-30, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Aug 30, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 35% during 2025-08-24, from $66M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-08-26, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Aug 26, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 37% during 2025-08-16, from $63M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-08-18, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Aug 18, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 63% during 2025-08-13, from $40M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-08-15, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Aug 15, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 37% during 2025-07-27, from $65M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-07-29, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Jul 29, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 49% during 2025-07-06, from $36M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-07-08, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Jul 8, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 25% during 2025-06-01, from $82M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-06-03, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Jun 3, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 30% during 2025-05-21, from $123M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-05-23, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on May 23, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 23% during 2025-04-25, from $103M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-04-27, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Apr 27, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 71% during 2025-03-28, from $48M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-03-30, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Mar 30, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 21% during 2025-03-20, from $39M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2025-03-22, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Mar 22, 2025; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 49% during 2024-11-16, from $204M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-11-18, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Nov 18, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 24% during 2024-10-24, from $250M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-10-26, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Oct 26, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 48% during 2024-10-02, from $639M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-10-04, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Oct 4, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 49% during 2024-06-27, from $520M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-06-29, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Jun 29, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 53% during 2024-05-15, from $201M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-05-17, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on May 17, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 24% during 2024-04-25, from $165M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-04-27, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Apr 27, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) fell 37% during 2024-03-26, from $397M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2024-03-28, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL crash on Mar 28, 2024; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
LAB's protocol TVL (DefiLlama) rose 69% during 2023-12-22, from $36M, and held at the next reading. Dated 2023-12-24, when that was clear; the move is the coin's from the close before. LAB saw a TVL surge on Dec 24, 2023; the price series does not cover the 30-day window, so no effect is measured.
Source: events from CoinPaprika, DefiLlama and exchange announcements; effects computed by PatternPlus (see methodology) · fetched
Against the venue medianMEASURED
How LAB's events compare with the venue median
as of · event_stats computed by PatternPlusread it →
Venue · kind
LAB median day 30
LAB n
Venue median day 30
Venue n
Up after 30 d (venue)
Position
all venues · funding extreme high
−42.4%
5
−1.1%
121
48.8%
below
all venues · funding extreme low
+200.0%
3
−4.6%
811
42.2%
above
all venues · all-time high
−26.2%
1
−38.6%
644
6.2%
above
all venues · TVL crash
+13.0%
2
−9.1%
411
32.6%
above
OKX · perpetual listing
−63.0%
1
−16.9%
251
36.3%
below
Bybit · perpetual listing
−57.0%
1
−16.9%
446
33.4%
below
Binance · perpetual listing
−60.4%
1
−14.7%
497
39.2%
below
Venue · kind
LAB median day 7
LAB n
Venue median day 7
Venue n
Up after 7 d (venue)
Position
all venues · funding extreme high
−18.9%
5
−1.5%
—
—
below
all venues · funding extreme low
+5.4%
3
−2.0%
—
—
above
all venues · all-time high
−42.1%
1
−17.1%
—
—
below
all venues · TVL crash
+62.7%
2
−1.3%
—
—
above
OKX · perpetual listing
−14.5%
1
−6.8%
—
—
below
Bybit · perpetual listing
−31.9%
1
−7.4%
—
—
below
Binance · perpetual listing
−12.3%
1
−5.2%
—
—
below
Day 7: the venue's event count and up-share are kept for day 30 only (—); its median uses every event measured to day 7.
Venue · kind
LAB median day 1
LAB n
Venue median day 1
Venue n
Up after 1 d (venue)
Position
all venues · funding extreme high
−5.8%
5
−1.4%
—
—
below
all venues · funding extreme low
+5.5%
3
−0.8%
—
—
above
all venues · all-time high
+2.7%
1
−3.7%
—
—
above
all venues · TVL crash
−13.6%
1
0.0%
—
—
below
OKX · perpetual listing
−0.5%
1
−0.6%
—
—
above
Bybit · perpetual listing
−20.1%
1
−0.3%
—
—
below
Binance · perpetual listing
−36.5%
1
−0.3%
—
—
below
Day 1: the venue's event count and up-share are kept for day 30 only (—); its median uses every event measured to day 1.
Source: PatternPlus, computed from every token in the peer set · fetched
4
The full write-up
every sentence on LAB · questions · sources
LAB in short
Filed under crypto on its own chain, LAB (LAB) has been with no start date recorded; it holds rank #1,438 by market cap as of Oct 6, 2026 and trades 99.8% below its Jun 2, 2026 high.
As of Oct 6, 2026 the price is $0.0503 (+1.8% over 24 hours), market cap $1.5M, fully diluted value $50.3M, holder count not reported, $2.4M TVL.
Status on CoinPaprika: active; LAB is the native coin of its own chain, so there is no token contract.
CoinPaprika tickers and DefiLlama, read Oct 6, 2026.
As of Oct 6, 2026 the record for LAB runs to 37 events, of which 0 are spot listings, 3 perpetual listings, 0 unlocks, 0 hacks and 0 funding rounds; 14 carry a day-30 measurement with a median of −42.3%.
From the latest data refresh
LAB (LAB), crypto on its own chain, holds rank #1,438 by market cap on Oct 6, 2026 and trades 99.8% under its Jun 2, 2026 high.
Its 3 measured listings show a median day-30 move of −60.4%, 0 of them above the venue median.
Since PatternPlus began recording on Oct 3, 2026 (4 daily snapshots), rank moved from #1,412 to #1,438.
LAB is on 0 spot and 3 perpetual venues on record; the earliest dated listing was Binance (perp) on Oct 17, 2025.
3 of its listings have a measured day-30 outcome (median −60.4%); 0 finished above the venue's own listing median and 3 below.
No unlock schedule is on record for LAB as of Oct 6, 2026.
No on-chain power check is on record for LAB as of Oct 6, 2026.
No funding round is recorded by DefiLlama for LAB as of Oct 6, 2026.
LAB lists 1 audit link on DefiLlama (PeckShield); no hack is recorded as of Oct 6, 2026.
No team member is recorded on CoinPaprika for LAB as of Oct 6, 2026.
DefiLlama reports $2.4M TVL and not reported revenue over 30 days as of Oct 6, 2026.
Generated from this record's own rows at build time; as of Oct 6, 2026.
Across 121 funding extreme highs across every token on record, the median move is −1.4% on day 1 and −1.1% by day 30; 48.8% were still up after 30 days; LAB's 5 sit below that median at −42.4%.
Across 811 funding extreme lows across every token on record, the median move is −0.8% on day 1 and −4.6% by day 30;
42.2% were still up after 30 days;
LAB's 3 sit above that median at +200.0%.
Across 644 all-time highs across every token on record, the median move is −3.7% on day 1 and −38.6% by day 30;
6.2% were still up after 30 days;
LAB's one sits above that median at −26.2%.
Across 411 TVL crashes across every token on record, the median move is 0.0% on day 1 and −9.1% by day 30;
32.6% were still up after 30 days;
LAB's 2 sit above that median at +13.0%.
Across 251 perpetual listings on OKX, the median move is −0.6% on day 1 and −16.9% by day 30;
36.3% were still up after 30 days;
LAB's one sits below that median at −63.0%.
Across 446 perpetual listings on Bybit, the median move is −0.3% on day 1 and −16.9% by day 30;
33.4% were still up after 30 days;
LAB's one sits below that median at −57.0%.
Across 497 perpetual listings on Binance, the median move is −0.3% on day 1 and −14.7% by day 30;
39.2% were still up after 30 days;
LAB's one sits below that median at −60.4%.
LAB sits above the venue median in 3 of 7 venue-and-kind comparisons as of Oct 6, 2026.
event_stats recomputed nightly; as of Oct 6, 2026.
No on-chain power check is available for LAB on its own chain as of Oct 6, 2026; every row of the panel is shown as unknown until GoPlus or the Jupiter token API answers.
Until then this site cannot say whether the issuer can mint, freeze or upgrade LAB; the check is retried at every rebuild.
37 events since Dec 24, 2023; 10 of the 14 measured were followed by a lower price 30 days later; best Funding +98% a year: longs paying shorts on Apr 7, 2026 (+1419.4%), worst Funding -64% a year: shorts paying longs on Jun 22, 2026 (−99.0%).
358 daily closes from Oct 14, 2025 to Oct 6, 2026 are plotted on a log scale, with the rank from 4 snapshots as a step line.
The all-time high marker sits at $27.15 on Jun 2, 2026, 126 days before Oct 6, 2026.
prices, metrics_daily, events and effects; as of Oct 6, 2026.
The change log holds 30 entries between Oct 5, 2026 and Oct 6, 2026; the newest reads: New record entry (funding high, Apr 7, 2026): Funding +98% a year: longs paying shorts.
LAB is on 0 spot and 3 perpetual venues on record; the earliest was Binance (perp) on Oct 17, 2025 and the latest OKX (perp) on Nov 1, 2025; the first perpetual opened on Binance on Oct 17, 2025.
0 delistings are on record for LAB as of Oct 6, 2026.
1084 of the 1087 tracked exchanges have no LAB listing on record as of Oct 6, 2026 (Bitget, Pionex, Azbit, Coinbase, WEEX and Lbank, among others).
exchange_listings from instrument APIs and announcements; as of Oct 6, 2026.
The all-time high on record for LAB is $27.15 on Jun 2, 2026, 126 days ago as of Oct 6, 2026; the price is 99.8% below it; over 30 days it moved 0.0% against 0.0% for BTC (beta 0.88).
Price change as of Oct 6, 2026: −0.1% over 1 hour, +1.8% over 24 hours, −5.7% over 7 days, 0.0% over 30 days, 0.0% over 1 year.
With $1.5M market cap against $50.3M fully diluted, 97.0% of LAB's valuation is in non-circulating supply as of Oct 6, 2026.
24-hour volume of $1.6M is 108.3% of market cap as of Oct 6, 2026.
Circulating supply is 30M of 1B total (3.0%) and a maximum of 1B.
The all tokens on record median 30-day change is 0.0% across 1594 tokens, so LAB sits below its peer set.
CoinPaprika tickers read Oct 6, 2026; BTC comparison from the BTC record.
1 address identify LAB on linea; as the native coin of its own chain it has no token contract.
No other token on record uses the symbol LAB as of Oct 6, 2026.
LAB shares its ticker with LAB (LABS ON GOLD), LAB (Labrador Asset), LAB (Labrador), LAB (LineaBank) and LAB (The Professor) (ticker collision on CoinPaprika, read Oct 6, 2026).
Identity fields from CoinPaprika as of Oct 6, 2026: start date not recorded, first market data Oct 14, 2025, proof type not stated, organisation structure not stated, no whitepaper link.
Cross-references as of Oct 6, 2026: CoinPaprika id lab-lab, DefiLlama slug layerbank, no GitHub repository recorded.
No follower or star counts were read for LAB as of Oct 6, 2026.
CoinPaprika /coins and DefiLlama /protocols (contract addresses), token_contracts, token_aliases; read Oct 6, 2026.
Set against 1594 all tokens on record tokens on Oct 6, 2026, LAB ranks at the 7th percentile for market cap, the 6th for distance from its high and the unranked for share of supply unlocked.
The peer median market cap is $12.8M, the median distance from ATH −95.0% and the median 30-day change 0.0%.
The nearest peers by rank are Aladdin DAO (#1,437), HashAI (#1,437), Phantasma (#1,439), Dora Factory (#1,436) and SuperWalk (#1,440).
Market cap: $1.5M (P7 of 1594; peer median $12.8M).
Volume / market cap (24h): 108.32% (P98 of 1594; peer median 2.42%).
30-day change: 0.0% (P50 of 1594; peer median 0.0%).
Distance from ATH: −99.8% (P6 of 1594; peer median −95.0%).
TVL: $2.4M (P45 of 429; peer median $5M).
peer set: all tokens on record (1594 tokens); as of Oct 6, 2026.
As of Oct 6, 2026: 56% chance LAB is lower tomorrow, typical move −2.0%, likely range −18.0% to +18.5%, from 307 similar past setups.
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
What is the LAB price prediction for this week?
As of Oct 6, 2026: 54% chance LAB is lower over the next 7 days — a coin flip, typical move −3.6%, likely range −46.6% to +56.8%, from 301 similar past setups.
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
What is the LAB price prediction for the next 30 days?
As of Oct 6, 2026: 56% chance LAB is lower over the next 30 days, typical move −8.9%, likely range −74.2% to +171.0%, from 282 similar past setups.
Prediction from past patterns, not financial advice.
How accurate are these LAB predictions?
Across 27 backtested 30-day calls on LAB, the call was right 48.1% of the time and the price ended inside the likely range 50.0% of the time.
Of the last 6 30-day calls, 5 of 5 were right.
Each backtest call used only the data available on its own date.
Who is behind LAB?
No team member is recorded on CoinPaprika for LAB as of Oct 6, 2026; the organisation is described as not stated.
When is the next LAB unlock?
No future unlock is on record for LAB as of Oct 6, 2026.
Is LAB listed on Binance?
Yes; Binance listed LAB and perpetual futures on Oct 17, 2025.
How far is LAB from its all-time high?
99.8% below the $27.15 high of Jun 2, 2026, 126 days ago, at $0.0503 on Oct 6, 2026.
Has LAB been hacked?
No hack is on record for LAB as of Oct 6, 2026; 1 audit link is listed.
Related records
Related records
as of · chosen deterministically from the joins on this page
10 related token records are linked below, plus 3 exchanges (Binance, Bybit and OKX) as of Oct 6, 2026.
293,063 older closes on 652 coins, back to 2017-08-17; 404 reached their first Binance day, 8 stopped at a 10x day or a gap, 1 older tickers of another coin left out, 239 with nothing older; 0 for later nights
313,593 coin-days stored tonight (314,256 held, the oldest 2020-08-05); 300 of 300 coins finished (each back to its contract's first day), 0 left for later nights; 3 days left out by the price check (the contract was another coin then); 0 errors; 104,391 days stored with no close of ours to check against
144 coins whose protocols took $100k+ in fees over 30 days; 134 read tonight, 144,935 coin-days stored; 1446 fee jumps and slumps; the rest comes over the next nights
55,006 coin-driver tests; 220 proven on 137 coins, 2874 likely; 47,817 more by the trimmed mean in the same cut, which found 68 proven and 167 likely more that earn with the tails in, and 565 more that did not on their newer half (dropped)
2026-10-06 16:27 UTC
none
—
edge
35 kinds of event against their coins' ordinary days, by day; a clear edge (95% range, both halves agree) up for fees_jump, funding_low, futures_listing, spx_drop, down for delisting, fear, futures_listing, hack, kr_discount, listing, tvl_jump
2026-10-06 16:26 UTC
none
—
effects
12005 effects, 51 stats rows
2026-10-06 16:26 UTC
none
—
etherscan
skipped: no ETHERSCAN_KEY in data/config_local.py or the environment
522 of our coins trade as Gate USDT perpetuals; 522 read tonight, 89878 coin-days stored; 4 liquidation spikes as events; the rest is read on the next nights
176 of our coins trade as Hyperliquid perps; 29 read up to now tonight (121 pages), 11234 coin-days stored; 179 funding extremes; the rest of the history comes over the next nights
827 of 1594 coins have a logo (coingecko 713, trustwallet 108, jupiter 5, website 1). Tonight 40 asked: 4 from coingecko, 3 from trustwallet, 1 from jupiter; 32 with none yet; coinpaprika refused us (HTTP 403) and was not asked again after 30. Without one, by rank: RAIN, CC, WETH, JITOSOL, RETH, KHYPE, RSETH, WBNB, SUSDE, SYRUPUSDC, METH, JLP (drop a file in data/curated/logos/<slug>.png)
703 collected series, 343 with enough history; 5,857 tests; 1 proven, 273 likely; 1 series tested from a later day (their values hold that day's move)
2026-10-06 16:28 UTC
none
—
setups
setups re-measured on our own prices
2026-10-06 16:28 UTC
none
—
signals
7 proven signals: ath after (30d), ath after (7d), cb_discount after (7d), pump after (30d), pump after (7d), vol_spike after (30d), vol_spike after (7d); 32 of tonight's predictions moved
2026-10-06 16:27 UTC
none
—
snapshot
daily snapshots and the change log
2026-10-06 16:47 UTC
none
—
snapshot_org
1423 governance votes on 40 coins from 40 Snapshot spaces; tonight 0 proposals read (to 2026-09-10), 0 big closed ones kept, 3 open or pending; 1 events new, 1 removed
3144 rules tested; 6 survived discovery and the holdout (5 new tonight): funding_7:high:3d:q10:all:clean, ret_1:low:1d:q20:bear, volume_trend:low:1d:q10:bear; 1788 distinct rules, each pool by each detector in one false-discovery cut; the trimmed-mean test found 32 more past discovery, 4 of them earning with the tails back in; 11 in the book
10 of 224 coins with 120+ days of supply history release on a monthly or quarterly pattern; 39 releases projected: APT (monthly, day 14), ARB (quarterly, day 18), ENA (monthly, day 6), ETHFI (quarterly, day 17), GRASS (monthly, day 29), IO (monthly, day 1), KCS (quarterly, day 1), MOVE (monthly, day 9), STRK (quarterly, day 16), WLD (quarterly, day 21)
2026-10-06 15:34 UTC
none
—
teamfinance
1 of 47 coins hold Team Finance vesting; 4 contracts still being read for the first time
Effects are measured as described on the methodology page. Facts are compiled from public sources; nothing on this page is advice. Corrections: [email protected].
ethplorer last fetched successfully on Oct 6, 2026 15:30 UTC;
the latest fetch failed (2026-10-06T15:30:28+00:00 HTTP 429 https://api.ethplorer.io/getTokenInfo/0x66fd8), so its figures are shown from that earlier run.
fred last fetched successfully on an unrecorded time;
the latest fetch failed (2026-10-06T15:34:09+00:00 no FRED_API_KEY: the jobs, PPI, PCE, GDP and retail sa), so its figures are shown from that earlier run.
This page is generated from 5,540 database rows and rebuilt daily; first published Oct 5, 2026.
PatternPlus compiles facts from public sources and gives no financial advice; corrections by email. As of Oct 6, 2026.
How to read this
Band 1 is the prediction: the chance of a higher price, the typical move and the likely range, with the real past setups behind it drawn as they moved.
Band 2 is why: the drivers, the next events and how our past calls on this coin went.
Band 3 is the data: every table and chart, dated; green means the price was higher afterwards, red lower.
Band 4 is the write-up: the same record in words, with the questions and the sources.